<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Paywall Times &#187; Card Processing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paywall-times.com/index.php/category/card-processing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paywall-times.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 16:42:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Why You Should Never Say Your Subscription Site Is &#8216;Safe &amp; Secure&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://paywall-times.com/index.php/why-you-should-never-say-your-subscription-site-is-safe-secure/</link>
		<comments>http://paywall-times.com/index.php/why-you-should-never-say-your-subscription-site-is-safe-secure/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 14:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MinalB21</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Card Processing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology for Subscription Sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lisa Dubrow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paywall-times.com/?p=2243</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week, Attorney Lisa Dubrow spoke to members of our sister site, Subscription Site Insider, about recent government crackdowns on companies collecting customer data online. One of her best tips was that no subscription or membership site &#8212; no website at all, in fact &#8212; should claim their site is &#8220;safe and secure.&#8221; Of course, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week, Attorney Lisa Dubrow spoke to members of our sister site, <em>Subscription Site Insider</em>, about recent government crackdowns on companies collecting customer data online. One of her best tips was that no subscription or membership site &#8212; no website at all, in fact &#8212; should claim their site is &#8220;safe and secure.&#8221;</p>
<p>Of course, we should all be using encryption technology and SSL certificates on our e-commerce and subscription payment pages (or s-commerce pages, as I like to call them). As Dubrow explained, you should definitely state whatever safety measures you take, like &#8220;using encryption technology.&#8221; But stating outright that your site is &#8220;safe and secure&#8221; can get you into a lot of legal hot water, especially since no site is that secure. We&#8217;re all vulnerable to hackers and identity thieves, and any security breech can open you up to a lawsuit if you claimed to be &#8220;safe and secure.&#8221;</p>
<p>You&#8217;ll also want to use those secure icons from vendors like Verisign and TrustE <em>only</em> if you have a licensing agreement with the vendor. And you should definitely test your wording and icon placement &#8212; different audiences respond differently to such assurances.</p>
<p>For more information on data collection crackdowns, privacy policies, and how to best notify your customers to any changes in your terms of service, <a href="http://www.subscriptionsiteinsider.com/members/ONDEMAND_2012_Legal_Updates__How_Data_Collection_Crackdowns_Affect_You.cfm" target="_blank">check out the instant replay of Dubrow&#8217;s presentation</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://paywall-times.com/index.php/why-you-should-never-say-your-subscription-site-is-safe-secure/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>1% Anxiety: When Chargeback Rates Can Be Higher for Subscription Sites</title>
		<link>http://paywall-times.com/index.php/1-anxiety-when-chargeback-rates-can-be-higher/</link>
		<comments>http://paywall-times.com/index.php/1-anxiety-when-chargeback-rates-can-be-higher/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 15:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MinalB21</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Card Processing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Express]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chargebacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paywall-times.com/?p=2164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For a while, paid content sites have been told to keep their chargeback rates below 1%. (Chargebacks, for those of you who don&#8217;t know, occur when a customer calls their credit card company to say a charge was unauthorized&#8211;they are not cancellations or refunds.) It&#8217;s a good-enough rubric, since high chargeback rates can get you [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For a while, paid content sites have been told to keep their chargeback rates below 1%. (Chargebacks, for those of you who don&#8217;t know, occur when a customer calls their credit card company to say a charge was unauthorized&#8211;they are not cancellations or refunds.)</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a good-enough rubric, since high chargeback rates can get you flagged for merchant malfeasance by credit card companies. However, it may not be as applicable for niche publications.</p>
<p>I recently spoke with <a href="http://www.paullarsenconsulting.com/" target="_blank">leading payment processing expert Paul Larsen</a>, who informed me that the 1% rate is really for high-volume businesses &#8212; sites with more than 10,000 transactions a month. That&#8217;s because credit card companies take volume into account when flagging merchants. For example, Visa only flags a merchant with 100 individual chargebacks in a month when those 100+ chargebacks make up at least 1% of the merchant&#8217;s total transactions. If you have fewer transactions &#8212; say a subscription base of 3,000 &#8212; and 100 chargebacks, you&#8217;re probably not going to get flagged (although you may want to read <a href="http://www.subscriptionsiteinsider.com/members/HOWTOMinimize_Chargebacks_For_Subscription_Payment_Processing.cfm" target="_blank">how to minimize your chargebacks</a> on our sister site,<em> Subscription Site Insider</em>).</p>
<p>Of course, rates vary by credit card company, and some, like American Express, have a complex algorithm that&#8217;s impossible to predict. And any chargeback is bad news, since you&#8217;re not only refunding money, but also paying a transactional fee and steep fine. Better to issue a cancellation and/or refund and ensure customer goodwill than wait for a chargeback. But a few here and there shouldn&#8217;t put you out of business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://paywall-times.com/index.php/1-anxiety-when-chargeback-rates-can-be-higher/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Increase Retention &amp; Revenues With This Lesson From Consumer Reports Online</title>
		<link>http://paywall-times.com/index.php/increase-retention-revenues-with-this-lesson-from-consumer-reports-online/</link>
		<comments>http://paywall-times.com/index.php/increase-retention-revenues-with-this-lesson-from-consumer-reports-online/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 16:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MinalB21</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Card Processing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Reports Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ConsumerReports.org]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Larsen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paywall-times.com/?p=1861</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our sister site, Subscription Site Insider, just came out with an exclusive case study on Consumer Reports Online this week, jam-packed with 18 tactics and lessons that can help any subscription marketer, and I wanted to share one of the best ones with you. Consumer Reports Online, which has been able to increase their subscription [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our sister site, Subscription Site Insider, just came out with <a href="http://www.subscriptionsiteinsider.com/members/CASE_STUDY_Exclusive_with_Consumer_Reports_Online__18_Effective_Tactics_for_Subscription_Marketers.cfm" target="_blank">an exclusive case study on Consumer Reports Online</a> this week, jam-packed with 18 tactics and lessons that can help any subscription marketer, and I wanted to share one of the best ones with you.</p>
<p>Consumer Reports Online, which has been able to increase their subscription revenues by charging separately for print and online subscriptions, employs one of the most lucrative best practices by using an account updater service for their payment processing. For those of you unfamiliar with account updater services, it&#8217;s a simple software service that runs all your subscribers&#8217; credit card numbers once a month against a list of everybody in the United States whose Visa/MC number has changed that month for whatever reason. The software then updates the customer’s credit card number without bothering the customer.</p>
<p>This practice has been known to significantly increase retention and revenues for subscription and membership sites with minimal effort.</p>
<p>For more tips on dealing with chargebacks and credit card declines in order to increase retention and revenues, check out the <a href="http://www.subscriptionsiteinsider.com/members/OnDemand_Lower_Your_Card_Decline_Rate_How_to_Fight_Churn_Caused_by_Bad_Credit_Cards.cfm" target="_blank">on-demand video talk by Paul Larsen</a> on Subscription Site Insider. For more killer marketing tips, <a href="http://www.subscriptionsiteinsider.com/members/CASE_STUDY_Exclusive_with_Consumer_Reports_Online__18_Effective_Tactics_for_Subscription_Marketers.cfm" target="_blank">read the full case study on Consumer Reports Online now!</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://paywall-times.com/index.php/increase-retention-revenues-with-this-lesson-from-consumer-reports-online/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New EMV Credit Card Technology May Increase Online Fraud</title>
		<link>http://paywall-times.com/index.php/new-emv-credit-card-technology-may-increase-online-fraud/</link>
		<comments>http://paywall-times.com/index.php/new-emv-credit-card-technology-may-increase-online-fraud/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 16:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MinalB21</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Card Processing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[card-not-present]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EMV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MasterCard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paywall-times.com/?p=1779</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MasterCard and Visa recently announced their plans to start EMV technology adoption in credit cards, 15 years after the technology was developed (it&#8217;s already been adopted in many countries, particularly in Europe). EMV (which actually stands for Europay, Mastercard and Visa) uses a digital chip to encrypt card data, much more secure than the current [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MasterCard and Visa recently announced their plans to <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204740904577193491695404570.html" target="_blank">start EMV technology adoption </a>in credit cards, 15 years after the technology was developed (it&#8217;s already been adopted in many countries, particularly in Europe).</p>
<p>EMV (which actually stands for Europay, Mastercard and Visa) uses a digital chip to encrypt card data, much more secure than the current magnetic strips. The push will mainly be for bricks-and-mortar stores to update their technology to read the cards by 2015. However, bricks-and-mortar updates have very serious ramifications for online merchants.</p>
<p>Randy Vaderhoof, Executive Director of the independent nonprofit <a href="http://www.smartcardalliance.org/pages/publications-emv-faq#q15" target="_blank">Smart Card Alliance</a>, spoke with me by phone today to explain how fraudsters migrate to online fraud when offline security is increased. Thus, financial institutions abroad, particularly in the U.K., have issued hand-held readers the size of a calculator to customers with EMV cards. Customers then scan their card, which issues a one-time password they have to enter to verify any online transactions. Some banks have also issued a &#8220;display&#8221; card, which are battery-powered cards with a display and button the cardholder can press to generate a one-time password.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s no news yet on what card manufacturers or financial institutions will be offering cardholders for online transactions, but subscription sites should start thinking now of how they can increase their security and decrease card-not-present fraud, which is likely to increase in the near future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://paywall-times.com/index.php/new-emv-credit-card-technology-may-increase-online-fraud/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FTC Case Could Affect How Payment Processors Address Chargebacks</title>
		<link>http://paywall-times.com/index.php/ftc-case-could-affect-how-payment-processors-address-chargebacks/</link>
		<comments>http://paywall-times.com/index.php/ftc-case-could-affect-how-payment-processors-address-chargebacks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 12:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MinalB21</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Card Processing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Law & Paid Content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Trade Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[payment processing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paywall-times.com/?p=1692</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In these economically-strapped times, the Federal Trade Commission(FTC) is cracking down not only on merchants who swindle consumers, but all parties involved in fraud, including payment processors. Recently, a U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas banned the use of &#8220;remotely created payment orders&#8221; by Landmark Clearing, Inc. &#8220;Remotely created payment orders&#8221; allow [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In these economically-strapped times, the Federal Trade Commission(FTC) is cracking down not only on merchants who swindle consumers, but all parties involved in fraud, including payment processors.</p>
<p>Recently, a U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas <a href="http://www.financialfraudlaw.com/lawblog/payment-processors-allegedly-debited-millions-consumers-bank-accounts-without-consent/3185" target="_blank">banned the use of &#8220;remotely created payment orders&#8221; </a>by Landmark Clearing, Inc. &#8220;Remotely created payment orders&#8221; allow merchants to enter a client&#8217;s name and bank number into a form and are cleared like a paper check, except that in lieu of a signature, the words &#8220;Authorized by Account Holder&#8221; or &#8220;Signature on File&#8221; appear. Federal banking regulations require the creator of a remotely created  payment order to have the express authorization of a consumer to process  the debit, but they are not subject to a lot of oversight, which makes them susceptible to fraud.</p>
<p>The FTC seems to have been tipped off by the exceptionally high chargeback rates Landmark&#8217;s clients were producing, sometimes higher than 80%. But the FTC didn&#8217;t just go after the merchants &#8212; they went after Landmark as well for promoting a service for merchants &#8220;with a high percentage of overall returns&#8221;.</p>
<p>Landmark is now banned from processing remotely created payment orders. Which means that sites that rely on recurring billing should be 1) seeking to reduce their chargeback rates as much as possible and 2) keeping an eye on their payment processor to make sure they&#8217;re on the up-and-up.</p>
<p>For tips on how you can reduce credit card declines and chargebacks, take a look at this <a href="http://www.subscriptionsiteinsider.com/members/OnDemand_Lower_Your_Card_Decline_Rate_How_to_Fight_Churn_Caused_by_Bad_Credit_Cards.cfm?sd=10" target="_blank">on-demand video </a>on our sister site, Subscription Site Insider.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://paywall-times.com/index.php/ftc-case-could-affect-how-payment-processors-address-chargebacks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Could the End of Credit Cards Be a Good Thing for Subscription Sites?</title>
		<link>http://paywall-times.com/index.php/could-the-end-of-credit-cards-be-a-good-thing-for-subscription-sites/</link>
		<comments>http://paywall-times.com/index.php/could-the-end-of-credit-cards-be-a-good-thing-for-subscription-sites/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 12:15:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MinalB21</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Card Processing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recurring Billing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[payment options]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Revenues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paywall-times.com/?p=1506</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A small 12-person start-up in Des Moines, Iowa is creating a lot of buzz recently with their mission to kill credit cards. Dwolla lets consumers pay bills and make purchases with the cash in their bank account when shopping online, a previously credit and debit-only platform. According to Business Insider owner and founder Ben Milne [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A small 12-person start-up in Des Moines, Iowa is creating a lot of buzz recently with their mission to kill credit cards.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.dwolla.com/default.aspx" target="_blank">Dwolla </a>lets consumers pay bills and make purchases with the cash in their bank account when shopping online, a previously credit and debit-only platform. According to <a href="http://articles.businessinsider.com/2011-11-11/tech/30381380_1_credit-card-interchange-fees-paypal" target="_blank"><em>Business Insider</em></a> owner and founder Ben Milne started Dwolla after losing $55,000 a year in interchange fees while running his first start-up.</p>
<p>By networking with financial institutions, Milne was able to create a platform that lets people pay for purchases through their bank account, including recurring payments. This can be good news as retailers no longer have to deal with card expiration dates or interchange fees (Dwolla bypasses the dreaded ACH system). People who get paid <a href="http://help.dwolla.com/customer/portal/articles/86684-dwolla-fees" target="_blank">only get charged $0.25</a> (that’s right, a quarter) for every transaction, no matter how small or large.</p>
<p>However, it’s unclear whether there are any additional bank fees, and if not, whether it will remain that way. Also, payments may not go through if consumers don’t have enough money in their bank account, causing frustration for both you and your consumers. And since you don’t own the customer’s bank info, you cannot transfer it if you are sold, which has been a major problem for membership sites using other payment alternatives, such as PayPal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://paywall-times.com/index.php/could-the-end-of-credit-cards-be-a-good-thing-for-subscription-sites/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>British Online Men&#8217;s Mag Blokely Launches Paywall; (Oddly) Offers Weekly Memberships</title>
		<link>http://paywall-times.com/index.php/british-online-mens-magazine-blokely-launches-paywall-offers-weekly-rates/</link>
		<comments>http://paywall-times.com/index.php/british-online-mens-magazine-blokely-launches-paywall-offers-weekly-rates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 16:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anne Holland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Card Processing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Launches]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paywall-times.com/?p=1477</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Blokely, a UK-based &#8220;cracking good read&#8221; for men, has launched a paywall in front of about 90% of its content. (There&#8217;s still a regular free story for men who are &#8220;afraid of committment&#8221;.) In an unusual spin on typical membership site offers, Blokely offers weekly auto-renew subscriptions as one of its options. We predict this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://paywall-times.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/blokely-490x281.png" alt="blokely" title="blokely" width="490" height="281" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-1478" /><a href="http://www.blokely.com">Blokely</a>, a UK-based &#8220;cracking good read&#8221; for men, has launched a paywall in front of about 90% of its content.  (There&#8217;s still a regular free story for men who are &#8220;afraid of committment&#8221;.)</p>
<p>In an unusual spin on typical membership site offers, Blokely offers weekly auto-renew subscriptions as one of its options.  We predict this will be a nightmare for the payments processing department.  The offer is strongly positioned as £2.50 pounds per week vs £3.95 per month, presumably to push men to a what-the-heck upsell.  They&#8217;d do better, though, if they offered £3.50 pounds per week vs £3.95 per month, because then the savings are more overt.  And, as every subscription marketer knows, really obvious works really well.    </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://paywall-times.com/index.php/british-online-mens-magazine-blokely-launches-paywall-offers-weekly-rates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>American Express, Verizon Wireless Join Forces on Mobile Payments</title>
		<link>http://paywall-times.com/index.php/american-express-verizon-wireless-join-forces-on-mobile-payments/</link>
		<comments>http://paywall-times.com/index.php/american-express-verizon-wireless-join-forces-on-mobile-payments/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 20:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>KathyMcCabe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Card Processing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit card processing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile payments]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paywall-times.com/?p=1193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems that as fast as I turn my head these days, there&#8217;s big news in credit card processing, especially in the mobile space. Here&#8217;s a big one:  Verizon Wireless and American Express announced today that are joining forces to offer mobile payments using one&#8217;s cell phone number and a pin number as authentication, rather [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems that as fast as I turn my head these days, there&#8217;s big news in credit card processing, especially in the mobile space. Here&#8217;s a big one:  Verizon Wireless and American Express announced today that are joining forces to offer mobile payments using one&#8217;s cell phone number and a pin number as authentication, rather than a credit card number.</p>
<p>According to <a href="http://allthingsd.com/20110801/verizon-wireless-and-american-express-find-an-intermediary-path-to-mobile-payments/" target="_blank">AllThingsD.com</a>, 100 million Verizon subscribers will be able to use the new service to shop on any Internet-connected device, including a PC, phone or tablet. Subscribers will have to sign up for a <a href="http://www.serve.com/how-serve-works.html" target="_blank">Serve account</a> through American Express, which can be funded by any bank account or credit card.  One potential hurdle  is that online retailer will also have to integrate Serve in order to take these payments. These various steps could make the road to widespread adaptation bumpy.</p>
<p>“Yes, they have to be Verizon and a Serve customer, but we are  preloading a number of devices — smartphones or tablets — with the Serve  app, and when you preload there’s a much greater uptake,” said Dan  Schulman, group president, Enterprise Growth, American Express told AllThingsD.com. Amex&#8217;s deal with Verizon isn&#8217;t exclusive so American Express could be partnering with other mobile companies soon.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re interested in learning more about credit card processing and accepting mobile payments for your subscription site, we have a collection of great <a href="http://www.subscriptionsiteinsider.com/members/department10.cfm" target="_blank">payment processing resources</a> at our sister site SubscriptionSiteInsider.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://paywall-times.com/index.php/american-express-verizon-wireless-join-forces-on-mobile-payments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Technology Turns Webcams Into Credit Card Readers</title>
		<link>http://paywall-times.com/index.php/new-technology-turns-webcams-into-credit-card-readers/</link>
		<comments>http://paywall-times.com/index.php/new-technology-turns-webcams-into-credit-card-readers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 18:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>KathyMcCabe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Card Processing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit card processing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netswipe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paywall-times.com/?p=1172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Software company Jumio today introduced a solution called Netswipe Scanning which will allow your subscription site customers to use their webcams as credit card readers. Basically the customer is prompted to hold up the credit card to his or her webcam and Netswipe scans it and inputs the data into credit card processing.  Here are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Software company <a href="http://www.jumio.com" target="_blank">Jumio</a> today introduced a solution called <a href="http://jumio.com/products/scanning/" target="_blank">Netswipe Scanning</a> which will allow your subscription site customers to use their webcams as credit card readers. Basically the customer is prompted to hold up the credit card to his or her webcam and Netswipe scans it and inputs the data into credit card processing.  Here are a few potential advantages of using this technology:</p>
<ul>
<li>Reduction in fraud.  Netswipe turns a &#8220;card not present transaction&#8221; into an &#8220;online card&#8221; present  transaction. A card present transaction lowers the risk of fraud  significantly.</li>
<li>Works with your existing payment provider.</li>
<li>Customers might be more likely to complete a transaction? This is up for debate as the only data so far is from a <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/jumio_turns_webcams_into_credit_card_readers_on_desktop_and_mobile.php" target="_blank">focus group run by Jumio</a> which concluded 79%  completed a transaction with Netswipe vs. 48% without.</li>
</ul>
<p>One question I immediately asked when reading about Netswipe: Is this solution <a href="https://www.pcisecuritystandards.org/" target="_blank">PCI compliant</a>?  Here&#8217;s what Jumio says on its site: &#8220;If you use Netswipe Scanning or Netswipe Recycle Swipe you will need to   demonstrate that your system can handle this data securely and that you   are taking full responsibility for your PCI DSS compliance. One part  of  this is the need for us to see a clean Vulnerability scan being made  on  your systems.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://paywall-times.com/index.php/new-technology-turns-webcams-into-credit-card-readers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Braintree Payment Solutions Getting Lots of Buzz</title>
		<link>http://paywall-times.com/index.php/braintree-payment-solutions-getting-lots-of-buzz/</link>
		<comments>http://paywall-times.com/index.php/braintree-payment-solutions-getting-lots-of-buzz/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 15:54:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>KathyMcCabe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Card Processing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[payment solutions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paywall-times.com/?p=1158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;re always on the lookout for the best payment solutions for subscription sites. Braintree Payment Solutions has gotten lots of buzz recently. Just last month, the Chicago-based company raised over $34 million in Series A funding. Braintree also keeps signing on big name clients such as Living Social, OpenTable, Picknik, etc. Here are some things [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;re always on the lookout for the best payment solutions for subscription sites. <a href="http://www.braintreepayments.com/" target="_blank">Braintree Payment Solutions</a> has gotten lots of buzz recently. Just last month, the Chicago-based company raised over $34 million in Series A funding. Braintree also keeps signing on big name clients such as Living Social, OpenTable, Picknik, etc. Here are some things to know if all the buzz has you considering Braintree as a payment solution:</p>
<ul>
<li>Braintree is an all-in-one  solution &#8211; offering merchant account, gateway and recurring billing.</li>
<li>The company is big on avoiding deceptive pricing and fee structures and offers a &#8220;truth in pricing&#8221; guarantee.</li>
<li>Braintree takes PCI Compliance very seriously and it looks like it does a good job getting you set up with <a href="http://www.braintreepayments.com/services/pci-compliance" target="_blank">PCI best practices</a> right away.</li>
<li>Braintree doesn&#8217;t lock you into a contract and doesn&#8217;t charge a cancellation fee if you terminate your account.</li>
</ul>
<p>Are you using Braintree as your payment solution? Give us your feedback below.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://paywall-times.com/index.php/braintree-payment-solutions-getting-lots-of-buzz/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

