<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Paywall Times &#187; Subscription Business Model</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paywall-times.com/index.php/category/subscription-business-model/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paywall-times.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 20:36:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>A Tale of Two Ecommerce Sites: When They Work &amp; When They Don&#8217;t</title>
		<link>http://paywall-times.com/index.php/a-tale-of-two-ecommerce-sites-when-they-work-when-they-dont/</link>
		<comments>http://paywall-times.com/index.php/a-tale-of-two-ecommerce-sites-when-they-work-when-they-dont/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MinalB21</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Other Revenue Streams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subscription Business Model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boston globe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Esquire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JC Penney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paywall-times.com/?p=1771</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When The Boston Globe split off from Boston.com last year, the Globe hogged all the financial glory with their paywall (and smart re-design). Boston.com was left with the corporate equivalent of spousal support.
But Boston.com rallied and has played to its strengths as a lifestyle website. It eschewed the paywall model and branched into ecommerce by [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When The Boston Globe split off from Boston.com last year, the Globe hogged all the financial glory with their paywall (and smart re-design). Boston.com was left with the corporate equivalent of spousal support.</p>
<p>But Boston.com rallied and has played to its strengths as a lifestyle website. It eschewed the paywall model and <a href="http://www.niemanlab.org/2012/01/why-boston-com-got-into-the-sports-tickets-business/" target="_blank">branched into ecommerce by selling sports tickets online</a>. Some journalists may call it a conflict of interest, but 21st century journalists know the difference between journalism and <a href="http://www.digiday.com/publishing/brands-apply-for-content-curator-roles/" target="_blank">content curation</a>.</p>
<p>And yet, while ecommerce cross-sales and upsales can work for a number of paywall and <a href="http://www.subscriptionsiteinsider.com/members/CASE_STUDY_ShirleyMacLainecom_Creates_a_Powerful_Community_Around_a_Celebrity_ThoughtLeader.cfm" target="_blank">membership sites</a>, it&#8217;s not always the best move. For example, <a href="http://www.foliomag.com/2012/esquire-ecommerce-effort-clad-fold?utm_source=Daily+Buzz&amp;utm_campaign=605ba7819d-_nb_DB_01-31-2012&amp;utm_medium=email" target="_blank">Esquire just announced that it will be terminating its ecommerce venture with JC Penney</a>. The main problem seem to be that the two brands had very different images with very different audiences.</p>
<p>So make sure your mission and audience is served by your ecommerce venture before jumping on the bandwagon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://paywall-times.com/index.php/a-tale-of-two-ecommerce-sites-when-they-work-when-they-dont/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Be Wary of Research Data on Print and Digital Subscriptions</title>
		<link>http://paywall-times.com/index.php/beware-research-data-on-print-and-digital-subcriptions/</link>
		<comments>http://paywall-times.com/index.php/beware-research-data-on-print-and-digital-subcriptions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 12:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MinalB21</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Subscription Business Model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital subscriptions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oprah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wired]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paywall-times.com/?p=1633</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GfK MRI&#8217;s semiannual measure of magazine readership was released to much ballyhooing this week, as publishers practically demanded a recount. The survey showed 70% of the 220 magazines measured were down in audience, including Wired (down 22%), O, the Oprah Magazine (down 10%) and New York (down 14%), according to AdWeek.
However, the publishers claim the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GfK MRI&#8217;s semiannual measure of magazine readership was released to much ballyhooing this week, as publishers practically demanded a recount. The survey showed 70% of the 220 magazines measured were down in audience, including <em>Wired </em>(down 22%), <em>O, the Oprah Magazine</em> (down 10%) and <em>New York</em> (down 14%), <a href="http://www.adweek.com/news/press/publishers-challenge-audience-report-137182" target="_blank">according to AdWeek</a>.</p>
<p>However, the publishers claim the survey doesn&#8217;t account for growing digital subscriptions. The problem may be in the methodology, as MRI collects information through in-person surveys. The likelihood that digital readers, with their enjoyment of mobile- and tablet-friendly content, are going to sit through an in-person survey is unlikely. Furthermore, the fact that consumers “understood” the questions doesn’t mean they necessarily wanted to answer them.</p>
<p>The take-away? Methodology is key in market research. This is especially true when new technology comes on to the scene, as beautifully illustrated by <a href="http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB115974322285279370-_YKmPwqXMhlWzstnlmaIf9g4UtU_20071002.html?mod=tff_main_tff_top" target="_blank">the infamous Literary Digest Poll of 1939</a> that erroneously predicted Alfred Landon&#8217;s victory over Franklin Roosevelt in the presidential election. Why did they get it wrong? Their sample had a high percentage of Americans with telephones and cars (i.e., wealthy Americans during the Great Depression who were less likely to vote for Roosevelt).</p>
<p>Remember: A unrepresentative sample will always misrepresent the data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://paywall-times.com/index.php/beware-research-data-on-print-and-digital-subcriptions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Membership Sites: The New Business Trend For Working Moms?</title>
		<link>http://paywall-times.com/index.php/membership-sites-the-new-business-trend-for-working-moms/</link>
		<comments>http://paywall-times.com/index.php/membership-sites-the-new-business-trend-for-working-moms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 12:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MinalB21</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Launches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subscription Business Model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[baby clothes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kids activities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[membership sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subscription sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[working dads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[working moms]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paywall-times.com/?p=1555</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems that subscription sites are all the rage!
A recent article on e-businessmoms.com tooted the advantages to busy moms about making your living with an online membership site. Of course, starting a subscription site is not as easy as starting a blog. The technology is more complex, not to mention the fact that you need [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems that subscription sites are all the rage!</p>
<p>A <a href="http://e-businessmoms.com/blog/barkbox-launches-a-monthly-subscription-service-for-dog-lovers/comment-page-1/#comment-27528" target="_blank">recent article on e-businessmoms.com </a>tooted the advantages to busy moms about making your living with an online membership site. Of course, starting a subscription site is not as easy as starting a blog. The technology is more complex, not to mention the fact that you need to know how to market, convert, retain and process payments. (Incidentally, I once heard someone complain to a payment processing service rep that their &#8220;button&#8221; didn&#8217;t work. After the rep apologized profusely for the technical glitch, the person explained, &#8220;No, it works technically. It&#8217;s just that no one clicks on it.&#8221;)</p>
<p>But still, we&#8217;ve seen some interesting sites in the subscription circle recently, many of them headed by working moms &#8212; from Jessica Kim&#8217;s <a href="http://www.babbaco.com/babbabox " target="_blank">Babbabox</a>, which provides parents with a kit of activities every month, to Caroline O&#8217; Connor&#8217;s <a href="http://www.plumgear.com/" target="_blank">Plum Gear</a>, which positions themselves as the &#8220;Netflix of baby clothes.&#8221; (Incidentally, men don&#8217;t seem to position themselves as working dads. Hopefully this will change &#8212; either working moms will just become women in business or <a href="http://wfnetwork.bc.edu/blog/working-dads-hidden-heroes-in-the-new-fatherhood-movement" target="_blank">working dads will get their say</a>.)</p>
<p>But is every idea viable? What do you think are some of the best subscription/membership sites out there? And have you had an idea that either soared or plummeted? Paywall Times would love to know! (We might even feature you in our sister publication, <a href="http://www.subscriptionsiteinsider.com" target="_blank">Subscription Site Insider</a>!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://paywall-times.com/index.php/membership-sites-the-new-business-trend-for-working-moms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FT Sees Subscription Sales Beating Ad Revenues, Dodges Apple App Charge</title>
		<link>http://paywall-times.com/index.php/are-subscription-sales-beating-your-ad-revenues-yet-think-pink-to-learn-how/</link>
		<comments>http://paywall-times.com/index.php/are-subscription-sales-beating-your-ad-revenues-yet-think-pink-to-learn-how/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 12:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MinalB21</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Other Revenue Streams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subscription Business Model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[app subscriptions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital subscriptions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipad subscriptions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paywall]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paywall-times.com/?p=1510</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Need to shut up a friend or colleague who insists subscriptions will never be a significant portion of your revenues? Well, here&#8217;s some good news out of the U.K. that may just do the trick.
The Financial Times (FT) just announced on Monday that it expects its subscription and cover price sales to overtake its print [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Need to shut up a friend or colleague who insists subscriptions will never be a significant portion of your revenues? Well, here&#8217;s some good news out of the U.K. that may just do the trick.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://in.reuters.com/article/2011/11/28/idINIndia-60770920111128" target="_blank">Financial Times (FT) just announced on Monday</a> that it expects its subscription and cover price sales to overtake its print advertising revenue this year, according to Reuters.</p>
<p>Digital subscriptions currently make up only 30% of subscription sales at FT (I suspect it&#8217;s because financial types like to be seen with that pink paper in hand), but this is likely to change moving forward. Recently, FT was able to create an app for iPhone, iPad and Android platforms that bypasses Apple&#8217;s app store, thereby saving them the 30% gatekeeper charge from Apple &#8212; as well as preserving their access to their own subscriber&#8217;s data.</p>
<p><span id="articleText">This knowledge helps FT</span><span id="articleText"> sell better-targeted  advertising for much higher rates despite a volatile advertising markets, and allows them to maintain a direct relationship with readers. In fact, their Web app was downloaded for the millionth time this month.</span></p>
<p><span>However, Apple tends not to like people who think outside the box (unless it&#8217;s them of course). So it remains to be seen if the newer iPhone versions don&#8217;t try to block such creative, money-saving solutions. After all, their <a href="http://gawker.com/5856260/apples-sleazy-secret-police-lose-their-leader" target="_blank">secret police</a> already <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13579_3-20003446-37.html" target="_blank">raided a journalist&#8217;s home</a> to prevent him from leaking information about the iPhone 4.<br />
</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://paywall-times.com/index.php/are-subscription-sales-beating-your-ad-revenues-yet-think-pink-to-learn-how/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adult Content Membership Sites Booming</title>
		<link>http://paywall-times.com/index.php/adult-content-membership-sites-booming/</link>
		<comments>http://paywall-times.com/index.php/adult-content-membership-sites-booming/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 17:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anne Holland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[R&D + New Site Launches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subscription Business Model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adult content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[afiliate marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paywall-times.com/?p=1490</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In early 2010, we estimated US adult content sites were selling an estimated $4 billion per year in memberships and other recurring billing subscription plans.  Given the amount of membership site launch and growth activity reported on by trade magazine XBiz.com just in the last month alone, we suspect that number is now considerably [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In early 2010, we estimated US adult content sites were selling an estimated $4 billion per year in memberships and other recurring billing subscription plans.  Given the amount of membership site launch and growth activity reported on by trade magazine<a href="http://www.xbiz.com"> XBiz.com</a> just in the last month alone, we suspect that number is now considerably higher.  </p>
<p>For example, last Friday Private Media Group launched a new softcore membership website Glamazones.com; and, this week lesbian content specialists Girlfriends Films noted for 2011 due in part to &#8220;the massive success of our membership site, we exceeded our own expectations.&#8221;   </p>
<p>Aside from compelling content, what marketing tactic is responsible for this success?  Adult sites rely far more heavily on affiliate marketing deals than any other membership site sector we&#8217;re aware of.  Plus, in the adult world directly competing sites are highly likely to be each other&#8217;s affiliates.  One common tactic, using overlays and exit pops to promote a competitor&#8217;s site to all traffic that bounces off your own site without converting to your own membership offer.  This is an idea that could work well for mainstream sites as well&#8230; but we don&#8217;t know anyone who&#8217;s yet to try it. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://paywall-times.com/index.php/adult-content-membership-sites-booming/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Amazon to Launch Subscription E-book Service</title>
		<link>http://paywall-times.com/index.php/amazon-to-launch-subscription-e-book-service/</link>
		<comments>http://paywall-times.com/index.php/amazon-to-launch-subscription-e-book-service/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 04:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>KathyMcCabe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Subscription Business Model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paywall-times.com/?p=1309</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Amazon is looking to become the Netflix of e-books by launching a subscription service to e-books for an annual fee, reports The Wall Street Journal.  There are already sites &#8212; like 24Symbols.com  and BookSwim.com &#8212; working on a similar model but Amazon has the position and power to negotiate with publishers on a far larger [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazon is looking to become the Netflix of e-books by launching a subscription service to e-books for an annual fee, reports <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424053111904265504576565040210224696.html" target="_blank"><em>The Wall Street Journal</em></a>.  There are already sites &#8212; like 24Symbols.com  and BookSwim.com &#8212; working on a similar model but Amazon has the position and power to negotiate with publishers on a far larger scale and put in place a compelling service.</p>
<p>&#8220;Amazon has told publishers it is considering creating a digital-book  library featuring older titles, people familiar with the talks said. The  content would be available to customers of Amazon Prime, who currently  pay the retailer $79 a year for unlimited two-day shipping and for  access to a digital library of movies and TV shows.</p>
<p>Amazon would offer book publishers a substantial fee for  participating in the program, people familiar with the proposal said.  Some of these people said that Amazon would limit the amount of books  that Amazon Prime customers could read for free every month,&#8221; <em>The Wall Street Journal </em>reports.</p>
<p>Publishers would certainly prefer that readers purchase e-books and are likely to worried about such a subscription service cannibalizing their sales.</p>
<div style="overflow: hidden; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; text-align: left; text-decoration: none; border: medium none;"><a style="color: #003399;" href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424053111904265504576565040210224696.html#ixzz1XhxeyGsY"></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://paywall-times.com/index.php/amazon-to-launch-subscription-e-book-service/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Subscription Site Trend: Expand Internationally</title>
		<link>http://paywall-times.com/index.php/subscription-site-trend-expand-internationally/</link>
		<comments>http://paywall-times.com/index.php/subscription-site-trend-expand-internationally/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 21:03:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>KathyMcCabe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Subscription Business Model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netflix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trends]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paywall-times.com/?p=1115</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The news that Netflix is planning to expand its subscription service to 43 countries in Latin America and the Caribbean isn&#8217;t too surprising. At Subscription Site Insider, we&#8217;ve found that now that business seems to be stabilizing in the U.S., subscription sites are looking to international markets. (Netflix is keeping it simple by offering streaming-only [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The news that Netflix is planning to <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2011/07/05/technology/netflix_international/" target="_blank">expand its subscription service</a> to 43 countries in Latin America and the Caribbean isn&#8217;t too surprising. At <em>Subscription Site Insider</em>, we&#8217;ve found that now that business seems to be stabilizing in the U.S., subscription sites are looking to international markets. (Netflix is keeping it simple by offering streaming-only in the new markets.)</p>
<p>For example, according to our new <a href="http://www.subscriptionsiteinsider.com/products/item32.cfm" target="_self"><em>Online Dating &#038; Matchmaking Sites Benchmark Report</em></a>, over the  last six months the online dating industry has seen a frenzy of activity with major  sites now accepting as many as 25 currencies and 38% of new site  launches taking place outside of the United States.  Get your <a href="http://www.subscriptionsiteinsider.com/Online_Dating_Matchmaking_Exec_Summary.pdf" target="_self">free copy of the executive summary</a> of the report here.</p>
<p>Food for thought for your subscription site: Should you be expanding internationally?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://paywall-times.com/index.php/subscription-site-trend-expand-internationally/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Get the Executive Summary of Our NEW Dating Site Industry Benchmark Study</title>
		<link>http://paywall-times.com/index.php/get-the-executive-summary-of-our-new-dating-site-industry-benchmark-study/</link>
		<comments>http://paywall-times.com/index.php/get-the-executive-summary-of-our-new-dating-site-industry-benchmark-study/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 20:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>KathyMcCabe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Subscription Business Model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmark reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dating industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online dating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[survey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paywall-times.com/?p=1027</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our publisher Anne Holland is thrilled to announce that our sister site Subscription Site Insider, in partnership with Courtland Brooks, is about to publish a new landmark study: the Dating &#38; Matchmaking Site Benchmark Report.
But first we need your help, and we are prepared to bribe you for it  .
If you are in or [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our publisher Anne Holland is thrilled to announce that our sister site <em>Subscription Site Insider</em>, in partnership with Courtland Brooks, is about to publish a new landmark study: the <a href="http://www.subscriptionsiteinsider.com/datingbenchmark.html" target="_blank"><span>Dating</span> &amp; Matchmaking Site Benchmark Report.</a></p>
<p>But first we need your help, and we are prepared to bribe you for it <img src='http://paywall-times.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
<p>If you are in or allied to this industry, please<br />
<a href="http://www.subscriptionsiteinsider.com/datingbenchmark.html" target="_blank">take our quick two minute, anonymous survey: http://www.subscriptionsiteinsider.com/datingbenchmark.html</a><br />
(quick &amp; anonymous)</p>
<p>Everyone who participates will receive our Executive Summarywith 10 tables and charts of the latest business data, plus our exclusive analysis in exchange.</p>
<p>And also,  please do spread the word.  The more industry execs who are involved in this study, the more useful the resulting<br />
data will be for everyone.  Tell your colleagues and partners to go to:<br />
<a href="http://www.subscriptionsiteinsider.com/datingbenchmark.html" target="_blank">http://www.subscriptionsiteinsider.com/datingbenchmark.html </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://paywall-times.com/index.php/get-the-executive-summary-of-our-new-dating-site-industry-benchmark-study/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should Your Paywall Site Offer Lifetime Memberships?</title>
		<link>http://paywall-times.com/index.php/should-your-paywall-site-offer-lifetime-memberships/</link>
		<comments>http://paywall-times.com/index.php/should-your-paywall-site-offer-lifetime-memberships/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 16:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anne Holland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conversions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subscription Business Model]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paywall-times.com/?p=834</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Back in the 1950s, the New Yorker offered a lifetime subscription for a few hundred bucks.  My Dad promptly paid up and still gets his copy every week nearly 60 years later.  These days, I&#8217;ve noticed more and more paywall sites making the same offer.
Initially, most were stock investing newsletters in PDF or email format [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back in the 1950s, the New Yorker offered a lifetime subscription for a few hundred bucks.  My Dad promptly paid up and still gets his copy every week nearly 60 years later.  These days, I&#8217;ve noticed more and more paywall sites making the same offer.</p>
<p>Initially, most were stock investing newsletters in PDF or email format with a companion site that&#8217;s mostly shovelware (little more than searchable back issues.)  A lifetime subscription would be several thousand dollars.  Most publishers who tested it did so for a quick cash hit.   But they learned that lifetime subscribers are also the easiest people to sell additional products to, such as seminars, cruises with celebrity advisers, and even additional sister-publications.  So, selling lifetime accounts takes a lot of risk out of launching additional products.</p>
<p>Now, several paywall sites have a new twist on the lifetime offer.  Instead of using it as an upsell for their most fervent fans, they make lifetime their *only* offer &#8212; no monthly or annual fees, lifetime only.  And the price is reasonable, what you might expect to pay for a one-year subscription.  Examples range from <a href="http://pwnage.cbfeed.com/">Arena Pwnage</a>, a tips site for World of Warcraft players with a $37 lifetime membership, to <a href="http://www.eliteparrotsclub.com">Elite Parrots Club</a> which gives you lifetime access to parrot training info for two payments of $47.77.</p>
<p>At first glance this seems counter-intuitive.  Consumers are increasingly gun-shy of online memberships and subscriptions because of the difficulties some have had with unscrupulous autorenew merchants.  So why not make your offer more attractive removing the word &#8220;membership&#8221; altogether and just saying it&#8217;s a one-time only charge &#8212; just like buying an ebook?</p>
<p>My take? In my experience, the split second a customer is no longer an active customer of yours, the likelihood you can sell them anything ever again takes a sharp dive.  For example, you&#8217;ll get a far higher conversion rate telemarketing expiring subscribers the week before their subscription ends than if you call them the day after.</p>
<p>But if you&#8217;re a member for life, then I can always market to you as a current member.  I suspect the conversions go up accordingly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://paywall-times.com/index.php/should-your-paywall-site-offer-lifetime-memberships/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Behind the Metrics: Gauging the Impact of Hulu’s Paywall</title>
		<link>http://paywall-times.com/index.php/behind-the-metrics-gauging-the-impact-of-hulus-paywall/</link>
		<comments>http://paywall-times.com/index.php/behind-the-metrics-gauging-the-impact-of-hulus-paywall/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 14:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editor Sean Donahue</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hybrid Model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subscription Business Model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hulu]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paywall-times.com/?p=804</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Online video site Hulu has been losing viewers since implementing its subscription model in June 2010. Hulu had about 27.5 million unique viewers in March 2011, according to ComScore – a 31% drop in unique viewers from March 2010. 
Sounds bad, right &#8212; more evidence that adding a paywall is a site killer? Except that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Online video site Hulu has been <a href="http://www.marketingcharts.com/direct/hulu-continues-losing-yoy-viewers-16977/">losing viewers </a>since implementing its subscription model in June 2010. Hulu had about 27.5 million unique viewers in March 2011, according to ComScore – a 31% drop in unique viewers from March 2010. </p>
<p>Sounds bad, right &#8212; more evidence that adding a paywall is a site killer? Except that one metric, whether it’s unique visits, pageviews, or video views, doesn’t tell the whole story. </p>
<p>In fact, Hulu’s revenues were up 90% in Q1 2011, according to a <a href="http://blog.hulu.com/2011/04/04/q1/">blog post </a>by CEO Jason Kilar. Adding another revenue stream in the form of online subscriptions must have contributed to that growth. </p>
<p>And the site’s paywall hasn’t killed advertising revenues, either: Hulu was the<a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-20053521-93.html"> top site </a>on the Net for video ads viewed in March, also according to ComScore. </p>
<p>Obviously, I’m not privy to Hulu’s detailed financials so I don&#8217;t know the exact impact their subscription model is having on revenues, or whether the model will succeed in the long run. But I do know that it’s easy to latch onto one metric – like pageviews or site visits – and make broad conclusions about a site’s health or the viability of paywalls in general. </p>
<p>In reality, though, sites with a hybrid subscription/advertising model are always balancing the two revenue streams, and declines in one metric may be offset by improvements in others. You can&#8217;t get a complete picture just by looking at a single number. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://paywall-times.com/index.php/behind-the-metrics-gauging-the-impact-of-hulus-paywall/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

