<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Paywall Times &#187; non profit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paywall-times.com/index.php/tag/non-profit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paywall-times.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 20:36:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Soliciting Voluntary Contributions &amp; Donations for Online Content: 2 Approaches</title>
		<link>http://paywall-times.com/index.php/soliciting-voluntary-contributions-donations-for-online-content-2-approaches/</link>
		<comments>http://paywall-times.com/index.php/soliciting-voluntary-contributions-donations-for-online-content-2-approaches/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 18:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anne Holland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conversions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subscription Business Model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non profit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://subscriptionsiteinsider.com/blog/?p=144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#8217;t like the voluntary contribution model because you never make the money you&#8217;re really worth because the vast majority of people won&#8217;t pay no matter how much they love you unless they are forced to.  (For example, only a tiny percent of regular NPR listeners ever donate a dime.) 
That said, voluntary contributions [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t like the voluntary contribution model because you never make the money you&#8217;re really worth because the vast majority of people won&#8217;t pay <em>no matter how much they love you</em> unless they are forced to.  (For example, only a tiny percent of regular NPR listeners ever donate a dime.) </p>
<p>That said, voluntary contributions make sense in three areas:</p>
<p>#1. Goal is maximum public reach:<br />
If the primary and overwhelming goal of your organization is to serve/reach as many members of the public as possible,  then you can&#8217;t slam down a paid barrier.  Be honest with yourself and your board of directors about this.  You&#8217;ve, in effect, decided to become an ad-based or a  charitable content publisher, not a paid content business.  Your next step should be to hire an ad sales team or a grants officer, because the public&#8217;s voluntary contributions probably will not sustain you.</p>
<p>(That said, 3.3 million people subscribe to Consumerreports.org content online, which is a nice fat chunk of the public despite the paywall.  It&#8217;s a testament to the usefulness of their content, and their marketing skills.  The question might be asked of &#8220;public&#8221; sites that are afraid of losing audience to paywalls, are you actually scared your content isn&#8217;t must-view enough to be worth the public&#8217;s dime?)</p>
<p>#2.  Your intended audience can&#8217;t possibly afford you:<br />
In this case, you&#8217;d be acting more like a cross between a charity and a non-governmental organization.  Your audience is the poor, the needy, the people without the means to pay. Advertisers probably don&#8217;t want to pay to reach them.  You&#8217;re publishing content that helps them in some way, so you need to be supported.  </p>
<p>#3. You have no other choice:<br />
You don&#8217;t have enough eyeballs to get advertiser traction, and your content isn&#8217;t &#8220;must view&#8221; enough to attract a large enough paying audience that you can afford the (even moderate) marketing and tech work it would take to pop up a paywall.  But, a few fans might pay, if you stick out the tip jar. So, what the heck.  </p>
<p>If you fall into one of these three categories, I noticed two cute online voluntary payment campaigns today worth trying: </p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.wikipedia.org">Wikipedia&#8217;</a>s new &#8220;Quoting a payer&#8221; campaign: </strong>: Wikipedia&#8217;s been soliciting voluntary contributions, with modest success (considering its traffic) for a couple of years now.  However today I noticed they&#8217;re trying a testimonial spin on it. They place a grey box at the top of an entry page that contains a quote from a previous named donator, saying why he or she gave, along with the amount they gave.  For example, I saw a quote from a guy named Don who reportedly gave $200 and said &#8220;This is a magnificent service!&#8221;</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://namaste-direct.org/ecard.php">Namaste Direct&#8217;s</a> ecard campaign:</strong>: Namaste is a microlending non-profit mainly operating in Mexico (yeah, the name confused me too &#8211; I assumed it was Nepal.)  Although they&#8217;re not a content company per se, they&#8217;re doing a great job of getting donations for ecard content.  They run Google AdWords ads against search terms such as &#8220;birthday card&#8221;.  Although it&#8217;s free to send an ecard, there&#8217;s such a prominent &#8220;donate&#8221; button next to the card that I bet many people wind up donating money just like I did. You&#8217;re in a giving mood, after all, and it seems appropriate because you just got a good content service &#8211; the ecard.  </p>
<p>Seen any other examples of effective marketing campaigns for voluntary contributions in exchange for content online?  Let me know. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://paywall-times.com/index.php/soliciting-voluntary-contributions-donations-for-online-content-2-approaches/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

